I have spent countless jarring hours riding on top of an all terrain vehicle (ATV) while doing survey work for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). I’ve taken all of the safety courses offered during my employment there and have never had any safety issue while using ATVs in the field. I’ve gotten them stuck a few times, but with the larger style Ranger ATVs, they get stuck in mud quite easily due to their weight.
To get the ATV into the field, I’ve used trailers that can hold up to 4 ATVs. I’m familiar with all tie down procedures and safe trailering operations. For the times when I was doing survey work alone, I used ramps to park the ATV in the back of the truck bed. I’ve taken ATVs into very remote areas on the back of a pickup truck and am quite experienced in off highway vehicle travel (OHV) and 4-wheeling.
I have experience operating manual clutch ATVs, automatic ATVs, 6-wheeled ATVs, and multi-passenger ATVs. I’ve ridden in all environmental conditions and over a vast array of land types.
I worked for two successive summers at the HaPET office in the Bismarck, ND USFWS building. We were concerned with areas in North Dakota and South Dakota that were west of the Missouri river, or west river.
This project started as an offshoot of the Partners for Fish and Wildlife (PFW) program. This program provided help for landowners who had a lack of water on their property. The USFWS helped them build dams in water basins for irrigation and livestock.
Each year, before we started the survey work, we would directly call each land owner to make sure they would still allow us on their property. According to the agreement the landowner signed, we were allowed unobstructed access to the wetlands that were created, but we didn’t want to ruffle any feathers. Most folks were quite happy to have our help and would invite me in for coffee so we could talk about their land.
Then it became time to pound the pavement and get to all the wetlands. The surveys usually didn’t take too much time, but some were very hard to access. We were given an ATV, binoculars, and a spotting scope. The best way to survey the waterfowl were when they were on the water and not moving a lot. So sneaking up on them, or scoping them from a distance were the best methods.
These were similar to the four-square-mile surveys. I really enjoyed these surveys. I had to travel to the southern most parts of South Dakota, part of Montana, to the northern most parts of North Dakota. Every day was different, and I really enjoyed that. Some times we would be laid up at a hotel during inclement weather, but typically we could work through most weather conditions.
We went out once in the spring to each wetland, and then again towards the fall to do a brood survey. The brood survey is super hard because all the adults have lost their breeding plumage, and the young hatch year birds, looked very similar to each other. It was much easier to ID them if the adults were around.
While doing belt transects, this skill was essential to the research project. Without knowing what all of the grasses and leafy plants were, how could you determine if it was a native plant or not?
During the first month of employment on this project, the members of the team all went to local herbariums and studied identification keys so we could accurately identify all the foliage we came across.
Learning this skills was the most rewarding experience I’ve had at a job. The task was daunting in the amount of things you had to know. When I was unsure of something, I would take a picture from every single angle I could, or even dig out the plant by the roots so I could later identify what it was. This lead to many plant pressings and a huge amount of pictures. I was even working on a photographic guide to the wild flowers and also a guide to ligules. Ligules are used to identify grasses before the seed head has had a chance to grow. It’s the only way to determine which species a grass is in the springtime, even for cool season grass.
I did this for 9 hours a day for 5 months and learned an immense amount of information. I wish I could have retained it all. Some random images from the collection are below.
I wish I could identify these grass species where I just have ligule pictures, but it’s nearly impossible without seeing the actual plant. I didn’t take enough pictures to identify it that way.
This was just a short list of the plants I saw and categorized. It’s unfortunate that I didn’t classify these plants shortly after I took the pictures. The grasses are hard to identify without having the whole plant in front of me, but during the survey period, I knew them perfectly. I wish I would have continued to create a ligule guide with key to the North Dakota prairie. The prairie there is a mix of short and tall grass, with hundreds of native grass species present, with nearly all of them being bunch grasses. Maybe I will get the opportunity again to classify the grasses and forbs of ND.